Issues

Aging and Poverty Commentaries

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, May 17, 2012: (Op-Ed) Improve senior care: Pennsylvania must rethink how it cares for low-income seniors

"With more than 300,000 residents age 85 and over, Pennsylvania's senior population is the largest it has ever been, and it is increasing at 10 times the rate of the rest of the population. Yet a proposed cut to the state budget would take away 4 percent of the funding -- $100 million -- for low-income seniors who receive at-home nursing care."

Respecting Our Elders: The Case for Preserving and Expanding the Senior Community Service Employment Program

Posted April 9, 2012

Asbury Park Press, March 26, 2012: (Op-Ed) Social security program: Is it really in crisis?

"On the other side, most liberals, labor unions and advocacy groups for the elderly oppose any reduction of benefits, such as raising the retirement age, eliminating benefits for the wealthy or creating private accounts. The National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare says these kinds of reforms would dismantle the program and be detrimental to low-income workers, minorities and women."

The New York Times, March 16, 2012: (Op-Ed) Don't Cut Pensions, Expand Them

"Fortunately, there's an easy solution. Rather than curtailing public and private pensions, New York and other states could save millions of workers from impending poverty by creating public pensions for everyone. While the recession bears some blame for the looming retirement crisis, experts agree that the primary cause is more fundamental: Most workers do not have retirement accounts at work. "

Ventura County Star, March 7, 2012: (Editorial) How about a race to the middle?

"And what has been the most significant public response to date to that looming crisis of poverty among the elderly? It's been a backlash against the one class of workers that still retains definedbenefit pensions and a measure of retirement security - those who work in the public sector."

Kennebec Journal, December 18, 2011: (Op-Ed) Elderly paid their dues with lifetime of hard work

"He made it big and has lots of rich friends and plenty of money. When today's elderly people started to work, and the baby boomers started to work, the pay was very low, so even though we worked hard all of our lives our Social Security checks are not high enough to meet today's prices."

The Washington Post, October 2, 2011: (Op-Ed) Mind the Medigap

"Almost all of those who participate in traditional Medicare, as opposed to managed-care plans, obtain supplemental coverage, either through their retirement packages (about 40 percent); from Medicaid in the case of low-income seniors (about 15 percent); or by purchasing private insurance policies known as Medigap (about 30 percent)."

Los Angeles Times, August 15, 2011: (Op-Ed) Boomer time bomb

A new survey by the SCAN Foundation and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, however, finds that Californians are woefully underprepared for the cost of such services. The survey is a wake-up call to the public, as well as a warning sign to lawmakers who want to pull the plug preemptively on a new federal insurance program for long-term care.

The Hill, April 27, 2011: (Blog) A path to poverty: Happy Mother's Day

"Every woman regardless of age, ethnicity, race or marital status should ask themselves one question this Mother’s Day: Why is the Republican plan to solve the nation’s debt and deficit crisis going to push me closer to poverty in my older years?"

Politico, April 21, 2011: (Op-Ed) Families still need safety net

"As Congress debates the budget, it must remember that the Great Recession wreaked havoc on the American middle class. But it must also focus on the plight of those who were poor even before the recession – and rendered nearly invisible by the economic crisis."

The New York Times, April 17, 2011: (Editorial) The New Republican Landscape

"It would cut food stamps by $127 billion, or 20 percent, over the next 10 years, almost certainly increasing hunger among the poor. It would cut Pell grants for all 9.4 million student recipients next year, removing as many as one million of them from the program altogether. It would remove more than 100,000 low-income children from Head Start, and slash job-training programs for the unemployed desperate to learn new skills."

How Would Changes to Social Security Affect the Poor?

Posted April 11, 2011

The New York Times, April 5, 2011: (Editorial) The Budget Battles: Prosperity for Whom?

"The plan would condemn millions to the ranks of the uninsured, raise health costs for seniors and renege on the obligation to keep poor children fed."

The Christian Science Monitor, March 30, 2011: (Op-Ed) Why Social Security must change now

"The program is neither a debt threat today, nor a deficit buster, defenders argue. It must be underscored that Social Security is an effective antipoverty program. Millions of Americans, especially low-income seniors, depend on these checks. The program needs to be protected."

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, March 23, 2011: (Op-Ed) Cutting nutrition for seniors is irresponsible, socially and fiscally

"The Commodities Supplemental Food Program is a federal nutrition program that provides a monthly 40-pound box of healthy food to low-income seniors in 37 states, more than 34,500 in Pennsylvania. The food for this program is federal commodities food..."

The Washington Post, March 15, 2011: (Op-Ed) A debt crisis that requires compassion

"Then there is the group about which we deficit pandas care most: the poor and working poor. They are at the greatest risk from a fiscal crisis, not merely because of the prospect of losing jobs."

The Hill, March 2, 2011: (Op-Ed) Defending Social Security

"Because of Social Security, the poverty figure for seniors today is less than 10 percent. Social Security also provides dignified support for millions of widows, widowers, orphans and people with disabilities."

Raise the Retirement Age, but Protect Those Who Can’t Work

Posted February 28, 2011

The New York Times, January 25, 2011: (Op-Ed) Raising False Alarms

"Without Social Security today, nearly half of all Americans aged 65 or older would be poor. With it, fewer than 10 percent live in poverty."

USA TODAY, January 5, 2011: (Op-Ed) This isn't Grandpa's retirement

"As a result, the infant mortality rate among participant families is well below the national average, despite their poverty rates -- an outcome that Van Ginkel finds more exciting than playing golf. And so, "I'm going to continue doing this as long as I can do it well," she tells me."

The Christian Science Monitor, December 28, 2010: (Editorial) Cut America's debt, but spare Social Security

"Irons is one author of a new 'budget blueprint for economic recovery and fiscal responsibility' that would spare low-income and moderate-income families from the 'drastic cuts' and some other austerity measures in the chairmen's plan."

The Philadelphia Daily News, November 18, 2010: (Op-Ed) Social Security is OK, for now. But the rich must pay

"It would reduce benefits slightly to the middle class in later decades, according to a New York Times analysis, but low-income people would get increased benefits."

The Automatic IRA Helps Build Assets and Retirement Security, By David C. John, Senior Research Fellow in Retirement Security and Financial Markets, Heritage Foundation

Posted November 8, 2010

No Time to Weaken Social Security, By Rebecca Dixon, Policy Analyst, National Employment Law Project

Posted November 3, 2010

Protect and Defend Social Security, Even While Reducing the Deficit, By Nancy Altman and Eric Kingson, Co-Directors, Social Security Works and Co-Chairs, Strengthen Social Security Coalition and Campaign

Posted November 1, 2010