Issues

Aging and Poverty Commentaries

Kennebec Journal, December 18, 2011: (Op-Ed) Elderly paid their dues with lifetime of hard work

"He made it big and has lots of rich friends and plenty of money. When today's elderly people started to work, and the baby boomers started to work, the pay was very low, so even though we worked hard all of our lives our Social Security checks are not high enough to meet today's prices."

The Washington Post, October 2, 2011: (Op-Ed) Mind the Medigap

"Almost all of those who participate in traditional Medicare, as opposed to managed-care plans, obtain supplemental coverage, either through their retirement packages (about 40 percent); from Medicaid in the case of low-income seniors (about 15 percent); or by purchasing private insurance policies known as Medigap (about 30 percent)."

Los Angeles Times, August 15, 2011: (Op-Ed) Boomer time bomb

A new survey by the SCAN Foundation and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, however, finds that Californians are woefully underprepared for the cost of such services. The survey is a wake-up call to the public, as well as a warning sign to lawmakers who want to pull the plug preemptively on a new federal insurance program for long-term care.

The Hill, April 27, 2011: (Blog) A path to poverty: Happy Mother's Day

"Every woman regardless of age, ethnicity, race or marital status should ask themselves one question this Mother’s Day: Why is the Republican plan to solve the nation’s debt and deficit crisis going to push me closer to poverty in my older years?"

Politico, April 21, 2011: (Op-Ed) Families still need safety net

"As Congress debates the budget, it must remember that the Great Recession wreaked havoc on the American middle class. But it must also focus on the plight of those who were poor even before the recession – and rendered nearly invisible by the economic crisis."

The New York Times, April 17, 2011: (Editorial) The New Republican Landscape

"It would cut food stamps by $127 billion, or 20 percent, over the next 10 years, almost certainly increasing hunger among the poor. It would cut Pell grants for all 9.4 million student recipients next year, removing as many as one million of them from the program altogether. It would remove more than 100,000 low-income children from Head Start, and slash job-training programs for the unemployed desperate to learn new skills."

How Would Changes to Social Security Affect the Poor?

Posted April 11, 2011

The New York Times, April 5, 2011: (Editorial) The Budget Battles: Prosperity for Whom?

"The plan would condemn millions to the ranks of the uninsured, raise health costs for seniors and renege on the obligation to keep poor children fed."

The Christian Science Monitor, March 30, 2011: (Op-Ed) Why Social Security must change now

"The program is neither a debt threat today, nor a deficit buster, defenders argue. It must be underscored that Social Security is an effective antipoverty program. Millions of Americans, especially low-income seniors, depend on these checks. The program needs to be protected."

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, March 23, 2011: (Op-Ed) Cutting nutrition for seniors is irresponsible, socially and fiscally

"The Commodities Supplemental Food Program is a federal nutrition program that provides a monthly 40-pound box of healthy food to low-income seniors in 37 states, more than 34,500 in Pennsylvania. The food for this program is federal commodities food..."

The Washington Post, March 15, 2011: (Op-Ed) A debt crisis that requires compassion

"Then there is the group about which we deficit pandas care most: the poor and working poor. They are at the greatest risk from a fiscal crisis, not merely because of the prospect of losing jobs."

The Hill, March 2, 2011: (Op-Ed) Defending Social Security

"Because of Social Security, the poverty figure for seniors today is less than 10 percent. Social Security also provides dignified support for millions of widows, widowers, orphans and people with disabilities."

Raise the Retirement Age, but Protect Those Who Can’t Work

Posted February 28, 2011

The New York Times, January 25, 2011: (Op-Ed) Raising False Alarms

"Without Social Security today, nearly half of all Americans aged 65 or older would be poor. With it, fewer than 10 percent live in poverty."

USA TODAY, January 5, 2011: (Op-Ed) This isn't Grandpa's retirement

"As a result, the infant mortality rate among participant families is well below the national average, despite their poverty rates -- an outcome that Van Ginkel finds more exciting than playing golf. And so, "I'm going to continue doing this as long as I can do it well," she tells me."

The Christian Science Monitor, December 28, 2010: (Editorial) Cut America's debt, but spare Social Security

"Irons is one author of a new 'budget blueprint for economic recovery and fiscal responsibility' that would spare low-income and moderate-income families from the 'drastic cuts' and some other austerity measures in the chairmen's plan."

The Philadelphia Daily News, November 18, 2010: (Op-Ed) Social Security is OK, for now. But the rich must pay

"It would reduce benefits slightly to the middle class in later decades, according to a New York Times analysis, but low-income people would get increased benefits."

The Automatic IRA Helps Build Assets and Retirement Security, By David C. John, Senior Research Fellow in Retirement Security and Financial Markets, Heritage Foundation

Posted November 8, 2010

No Time to Weaken Social Security, By Rebecca Dixon, Policy Analyst, National Employment Law Project

Posted November 3, 2010

Protect and Defend Social Security, Even While Reducing the Deficit, By Nancy Altman and Eric Kingson, Co-Directors, Social Security Works and Co-Chairs, Strengthen Social Security Coalition and Campaign

Posted November 1, 2010

The Conventional Wisdom is Wrong: We Can Afford Entitlements, By Heidi Hartmann, President, Institute for Women’s Policy Research

Posted October 20, 2010

Why Deficit Reduction Is Necessary and Need Not Hurt the Poor, By Isabel Sawhill, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution

Posted October 18, 2010

The Washington Post October 17, 2010: (Editorial) Another senior moment

"The poverty rate for seniors fell last year, from 9.7 percent to 8.9 percent. In 2009, incomes rose for households headed by people 65 and older, while every other age group lost ground, according to Census Bureau figures reported recently in USA Today."

The Kansas City Star, September 8, 2010: (Editorial) Social Security: The firewall between aging with dignity and aging in financial desperation

"Third, Social Security lifts retirees from poverty. In 2008, Social Security kept almost 36 percent of older Americans out of poverty. In Kansas, about 37.5 percent of the state’s 65-plus population was kept out of poverty because of Social Security."

Los Angeles Times, June 15, 2010: (Op-Ed) Deficit thinking

"Social Security and Medicare are not broken. They are successful, popular programs that protect America's elderly from poverty. Cutting them would be devastating."